Re: [hatari-devel] debugger help

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]



Eero,

When you say 'next address' do you mean next logical PC address? Or next memory-contiguous address e.g. PC+opsize? It seems that when I stepped a conditional branch which closes a loop it would execute the whole loop before breaking and that suggests it executes until PC+opsize.

I remembered this because I had trace cpu_disasm enabled, and it took rather a long time to finish :-)

I'll make a note to test this again next time I debug, in case I misinterpreted something. It was this effect which caused me to start using 's' instead of 'n' because there is less margin for error...


"next" command should actually do that.  It runs code until PC is
on next address, from the instruction on which you currently are,
it doesn't care what happens in between.



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/