| Re: [hatari-devel] No address error when accessing odd addresses? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] No address error when accessing odd addresses?
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:16:25 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1378923385; l=1039; s=domk; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=Cy5Ns/InPz/qtbTfFqg+iNlFHMk=; b=wvLocYWGrxY6hbXWXiGJ6l73GqRdlsyX1q7YvPkPc7j+Rj3FUIGu8J81hB0h5tMSgEO KPn5Ism4qrYdXiZuc5mVxI4FomSPeROQYBjSYxTNWGwj1quF48thXvXWgBpA9jUSp7pf5 0x/p76inDl/On4TAlfmItKsdxZ9i/GiSj/o=
Hi Thomas,
> Ah, wait, you're writing about the "Cycle exact" option... are you
> using the WinUAE cpu core? ... that's slightly different and there might
> be some bugs left in its option management (that's why it is marked as
> experimental ;-)).
Yes, I'm using the WinUAE core. Well, somebody has to use it in order
find what's probably still has to be fixed.
> But first ... what did you exactly change in the GUI? The "Slower but
> more compatible CPU" option is named there "Prefetch mode, slower"
> instead, if I remember correctly.
First I enabled "More compatible, slower", but there was still not
(expected) address error. Next I enabled "Cycle exact, slower", and then
the IDE emulation appeared to cause problems.
> Also, do you see a line starting with "Building CPU" on the console
> when you change that option and return the emulation? If yes, what does
> it exactly print?
Building CPU, 45989 opcodes (3 -1 1)
CPU=68030, FPU=68882, MMU=0, JIT=0.
CPU cycleunit: 1 (0.500)
Take care
Uwe