On 15 February 2013 21:45, Eero Tamminen
<oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Does this look even remotely right:
---------
> d 0xe2f044
$e2f044 : 3f00 move.w d0,-(sp) 0.31% (43303, 173268, 43303)
$e2f046 : 4eb9 00e2 fe7e jsr $e2fe7e 0.31% (43303, 433172, 0)
$e2f04c : 548f addq.l #2,sp 0.31% (43303, 34, 86597)
$e2f04e : 4a80 tst.l d0 0.31% (43303, 86692, 28)
$e2f050 : 674a beq.s $e2f09c 0.31% (43303, 86666, 43299)
---------
?
There can't be fewer total cycles than visits so something is wrong there. However it's hard to tell from one instance if it's some sort of off-by-one problem or more complicated. Would need to watch what happens at lots of sites, and possibly on the first few visits to each affected site.
D.