Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari profiler updates and CPU cycle questions

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari profiler updates and CPU cycle questions
From: Douglas Little <doug694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:22:57 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GnbFbSG5/D8ebLRDthv3mNhp1ptQuOl1qldZRbKJKsI=; b=YCZTxMF8FSU6gNsAJWZMFzmG/6Z0DwGEUcm2ZXqU70SfyGjdNWwn/6UVZxg4fHeez5 HnChVFhEAE6iLX2OLamKmen+GtQ+zQA3mUBtU6ZODqEEGpUDPAjqhksWbB63chiYuWhJ wO5IXc/nVO1Cu4Pk35F1KkUVLUW0+HAhhpjcipSZQbqOHhYHa7Jm47yPSsrGfPZpycOo KS6Cc8fEjJCmFzv4t17PVHG755aJqcLCcgI5IsUU5lOQg9hDQuxIgEjGA+YcNfH1KCTH xrQjDebiR/LsVFr09rci2zViTYcJCPPIYJqt81k/AfZDQbovexXzjr5vtaNw0zNHStUZ 382g==

> In that case the values do make sense and it must be correct yes.

Would the min/max information still be useful?

I think so, since it is a boundary range for that instruction, which can be analysed offline for optimisation / reorg purposes.

References:
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari profiler updates and CPU cycle questions
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari profiler updates and CPU cycle questions
  - From: Laurent Sallafranque
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari profiler updates and CPU cycle questions
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] Hatari profiler updates and CPU cycle questions
  - From: Eero Tamminen

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+