Re: [hatari-devel] Little disassembler bug ?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

Hi Eero,

I think Nicolas wanted to keep the new core Winuae disassembler, but I don't remember why.

Nicolas ?


Le 07/10/2012 21:41, Eero Tamminen a écrit :

On sunnuntai 07 lokakuu 2012, Laurent Sallafranque wrote:
While debugging something, I've noticed what I think is a little bug in
desassembler :

In my code, I have
   mulu.l        d1,d0

With the (d) command, I read the correct opcode :
   $05d9a4 : 4c01 0000                            mulu.l    d1,d0

When I activate cpu_disasm, I read :
   0005D9A4 4c01 0000                MULL.L #$0000,D1

The result of the mul seems correct in d0.l after the mulu.l,
but the disassembled instruction seems wrong.
I assume this is with the WinUAE CPU core.

You need to change lines like this in its newcpu.c file:
   m68k_disasm(stderr, m68k_getpc (), NULL, 1);

To look like this:
   Disasm(stderr, m68k_getpc (), NULL, 1, DISASM_ENGINE_EXT);

I.e. instead of using the CPU core builtin disassembler,
use the disassembler contributed by Markus Fritze as
the old UAE core nowadays does.

Or is there some good reason why WinUAE core is using
its own disassembler?

	- Eero

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+