| [eledmac] sameword and lemma |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eledmac Archives
]
- To: eledmac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [eledmac] sameword and lemma
- From: Florian Grammel <florian.grammel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:22:15 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=sMUk7d1aTA8ghc2Aviyvgm0dcCifvaiPf5ENRA5hqn0=; b=wpUpeFu1FEFESxZ1vG7rSvjHWi+9HpiEi5ntQ8WJeAwH3so2eZDBLR05mSgpMMgRLH BKvKyOdkmvr8f3lv7P2sM5B/Ze40LqzXsaImcYb9CFU9aOODqPiIX0S4PlDY7jeXE3xv dVFop/xGSL2KQMRgQE135CfU/0+r8nM92ITRRrIPAeFnKHVLbc8/RS5bXCUTxtVmNPs4 D7uhrh25hXpBfUvWgf0/MTEsQ2FwVsNZyayroQsTypX26V8WObRfSdH6TFtRdXWDWhCL 91p6jhRXJqC6b7bfJMYX92FH2n2wvrNNQXeLgGA8gprip2HyIedHkSMt4HTFo6aufoa/ aa/w==
I am not sure whether I have completely understood all intricacies of \sameword together with \lemma as described in the reledmac-manual p.28f.
Would it be correct to conclude the following rule:
"I only have to think about setting the sameword-levels manually when there is a second (third…) edtext with a lemma that references the same \sameword{}s nested within my top-level edtext. In all other instances using \sameword[inlemma]{…} will suffice."
If I could assume this to be correct, I could use [inlemma] as a default and only search for the few nested instances afterwards. That would make my conversion from another format a lot easier.
Thanks in advance,
Florian.
____________________________________________
Florian Grammel
Copenhagen, Denmark