| Re: [eledmac] re: multiple LaTeX runs needed |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eledmac Archives
]
here my answer to you previous email
"It is possible the reminder is bugged. For this point, I will trust more in latexmk, which looks on the stability of the auxiliary files, than to reledmac."
Le 11 avr. 2016 à 14:20, Marjorie Burghart <marjorie.burghart@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> [sorry, I'm experiencing email issues on my other address, I'm not sure this message was delivered]
>
>
> Thanks!
> I tried that and it works, but with one of my files I keep getting the reminder, even though latexmk says everything is up-to-date. And if I run again xelatex manually on this file, I still get the reminder telling me, invariably, that I must run LaTeX two more times.
> I'm guessing there's a problem with this particular file (which is very long, 161 A4 pages).
> Any idea what I should check in the file, that could be triggering this issue?
> Best, Marjorie
>
>
>
>
> > You should use latexmk. Read http://geekographie.maieul.net/79
>
> Le 10 avr. 2016 à 00:32, Marjorie Burghart <marjorie.burghart@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I am a reledmac (and LaTeX) newbie, so please forgive my probably very silly questions :)
> >>
> >> When I compile my .tex file with xelatex, I get the following "reledmac reminder" in the log file:
> >>
> >> The number of the footnotes in this section has changed since the last run.
> >> You will need to run LaTeX two more times before the footnote placement
> >> and line numbering in this section are correct.
> >>
> >> (the number of necessary runs may vary).
> >>
> >> What I do not get is why I see this message even if it is the first time I rum xelatex on this file.
> >> I would need to know how many latex runs are necessary for each file, because I do on-the-fly a server-side transformations to serve ready-to-read PDFs to the users.
> >> I've tried running xelatex 3 times on each file, but for one thing it slows down the process, and for another it is not always enough.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for your helps!
> >> Marjorie
> >>
> >>