Re: [eigen] Isometry is not being initialized like Affine?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eigen] Isometry is not being initialized like Affine?
From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:40:07 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qd5IeQKqNCFvQ0dfhIP3tqD1CFNaCRjh+yv7eYWL0qY=; b=QrbF1asnjZK9sTk6d5rMuRJxOEG5MJqMc9ABfW+104/MSeWkIlLwbUyLh+hCHQ2SSt lnCG4hoouYQkRpg+kjJuaKAfnOP84YDtDqjo5fhZLbAotGaWteVuTtnDDjHbcE1XorXB CpQXTSFKCndUDhS2HEkgwPt+ZNXsD/lXLmcdODvQe60IdOSfW8ctVyotv4MoYzOHYlgb J+r/BUN62aAsdO7ZW2W419FsQXLTvDdAecPi1anwvH+uJ/2I9GlDooUbvWncnF/3a4qj KmPL2Ccz4s15FRZYSof34IAxO4nQeiM6ygurXpbeJ+pjmKaIhmzP2F4mwYkrzx1wMZyw W9mw==

Thank you for the patch. I applied it.

Gaël.

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 8:39 AM Greg Coombe <greg.coombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Both the isometric and affine transforms have an implicit 3rd row of [0, 0, 0, 1]. It looks like the constructor is initializing this properly for Affine, but not for Isometry.

I added some tests specifically for Isometry and Affine which verify this.

Greg

References:
- [eigen] Isometry is not being initialized like Affine?
  - From: Greg Coombe

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [eigen] Avoid SVD in rotation() for Isometry
Next by Date: [eigen] unsubscribe
Previous by thread: [eigen] Isometry is not being initialized like Affine?
Next by thread: [eigen] C++11 Style Initialisation

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/