[eigen] FYI: C++ committee proposal to solve our alignment problems

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eigen] FYI: C++ committee proposal to solve our alignment problems
From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:49:29 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PSguO9066BhQU5YSaSOAuBLTK4DmXB3Gp3CV/k4TFYs=; b=iyP7xzD9xTMVHHhDebxa0ee8jIWf7Zor/liNysZ+PiFmlk6osUCIT3hKOvMqo+8bw3 6xMjSjPxk9IUkDfL1gj2IGeJny0DGAn0XyT0hMDxK2tnhwEqWd/C1JmfAwki069SP75U zJuHgrclLjqHNV0DA6HfNbmacElW/g1XX8txnMTHq98hHjFVtP0ph7RZnKzDB3l/ipNP teCq+gORQFjYlY31LnT35DhDxBOBbjBlt+a4SwvEbdXSsEm6+gKCsXFI+wnJ0mXKUXA3 8fjauVWpDKomnJ4wYZvIobWG+LJbH7tpMbyNvYlmU28Iu0KcqyOgUUnz5d9dupFVmuyI mzyw==

Hi List,

This proposal looks like what we've been waiting for, regarding nondefault alignment not being honored by operator new, and having to overload operator new as a result:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0035r0.html

Cheers,

Benoit

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eigen] FYI: C++ committee proposal to solve our alignment problems
  - From: Marc Glisse

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [eigen] Sparse Cholesky updating
Next by Date: Re: [eigen] FYI: C++ committee proposal to solve our alignment problems
Previous by thread: Re: [eigen] Sparse Cholesky updating
Next by thread: Re: [eigen] FYI: C++ committee proposal to solve our alignment problems

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/