Re: [eigen] Code coverage and templates

[Christoph Hertzberg <chtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This SO answer
http://stackoverflow.com/a/19792966
suggests that explicitly instantiating the template classes to be tested 
should work.

Christoph

Am 09.02.2015 um 10:59 schrieb Gael Guennebaud:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know how to get better code coverage outputs from gcov in the
> case of inlining and templates? In particular, we should find a way to
> include *all* functions. For instance, the specialization of
> Block<SparseMatrix> included a few un-tested and un-compiled functions even
> though gcov returns a coverage of 100%. See:
>
> http://manao.inria.fr/CDash/viewCoverageFile.php?buildid=17299&fileid=282195
>
> lines 169-187. Incidentally, some of these functions were broken...
>
> thanks,
> gael


--
----------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inf., Dipl.-Math. Christoph Hertzberg
Cartesium 0.049
Universität Bremen
Enrique-Schmidt-Straße 5
28359 Bremen

Tel: +49 (421) 218-64252
----------------------------------------------