[eigen] SimpliciaLDLT::analyzePattern

[eigen] SimpliciaLDLT::analyzePattern_preordered

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eigen] SimpliciaLDLT::analyzePattern_preordered
From: Sameer Agarwal <sameeragarwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:56:37 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=30RK9/1ToA+0cKX7iHPURKQHDRqoZoVztu5lx+AcQPE=; b=j2QP7UEcfNVSONi1MeaMdoC2HztwdoZ+dWeOT74/xsddwtdr28sykaXADwo6xi2LAP OJ9wxpGqDITBmzntrORD/1fItxTs2is6rkHhq6hmifSw/3tcCjEca4v+qOM6EesudxzS NSmjB87MHmPCJ01l+crDOxdZHnTr3FreWheIU8w8E2UodEnNe2VRnyDTyWxdrxu9FCNK coLLtjABKLuHW5jq+jtAd+JMygNrTL+qtPDN7/KGpOVS1aiHkbMYEfM6wmE/nzU9wKWQ 5IbzL0NhTpoKtJoMXAJVIVSm8vNxxH1YMPnNMBGpOWqueGXsV9dqYqiXKNGRqnpAt7HA grBw==

Hi,

Is there a reason why analyzePattern_preordered is not documented in the public API for SimplicialLDLT?

There are situations in which, an ordering is computed via some indirect means or the natural ordering of the matrix is good enough that we do not want to spend time finding an ordering all over again. In such cases, this is a very useful method to have.

Is it okay to depend on this method in user code?

Thanks,

Sameer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eigen] SimpliciaLDLT::analyzePattern_preordered
  - From: Gael Guennebaud

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [eigen] Numerical Integration module
Next by Date: Re: [eigen] Memory Leak When Constructor of User-Defined Type Throws Exception
Previous by thread: Re: [eigen] Possible Bug ?
Next by thread: Re: [eigen] SimpliciaLDLT::analyzePattern_preordered

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/