Re: [eigen] Named branches

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On 07.05.2013 11:07, Hauke Heibel wrote:
does anybody over here have objections against using named branches for
providing patches and new features (bitbucket supports named branches +
pull requests).

Will this still give unauthorized users the possibility to create branches? (ok, obviously forks would not be forbidden then, I guess) Furthermore, I prefer very experimental features (which are abandoned quite often) not to pollute the commit history of the main repository.

That said, I don't have strong objections, but I prefer the way it is at the moment.


Dipl.-Inf., Dipl.-Math. Christoph Hertzberg
Cartesium 0.049
Universität Bremen
Enrique-Schmidt-Straße 5
28359 Bremen

Tel: +49 (421) 218-64252

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+