| Re: [eigen] Named branches |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Named branches
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 14:38:50 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iQ3uN9vnIK5ZmWlnB1vt3FqidWDCVqTQATw/c6Oihco=; b=AodMaEfvIyKtL7cIkty5fNDt3WN+1oCwdJguR/81cLmGuM5APS/Wv4KW8a/jU8NeZk OYFkBEXqxen8Ow0Tp988x7ZW/grYrsyXZl2xt1aAn+9IyI473KsLkSU2aZmR2VmR0hFk dvaP9miObyXM3p8Jt1Ra+s1uMh8uQ6mUedPpGOpgUoWJabGk4a0J7A3ny74FXcjAVj2C uOkPn154Qvm2EWBcpGQH+ktdlG4x6G1EQVWCi44BZhK5pOVZPmc9F3G7Xim77M4qnpyo kDTNPO3p3dN9xBog9ojhRqdFrWOSXW0NCQgzST16DksiCaUtR04wJWHoK3aai5v3xfAm ol/g==
I'm also temped to favor forks to keep the main repository as simple
as possible.
gael
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Christoph Hertzberg
<chtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07.05.2013 11:07, Hauke Heibel wrote:
>>
>> does anybody over here have objections against using named branches for
>> providing patches and new features (bitbucket supports named branches +
>> pull requests).
>
>
> Will this still give unauthorized users the possibility to create branches?
> (ok, obviously forks would not be forbidden then, I guess)
> Furthermore, I prefer very experimental features (which are abandoned quite
> often) not to pollute the commit history of the main repository.
>
> That said, I don't have strong objections, but I prefer the way it is at the
> moment.
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------
> Dipl.-Inf., Dipl.-Math. Christoph Hertzberg
> Cartesium 0.049
> Universität Bremen
> Enrique-Schmidt-Straße 5
> 28359 Bremen
>
> Tel: +49 (421) 218-64252
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>