| Re: [eigen] Eigen 3.1.0-rc2 released! |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Eigen 3.1.0-rc2 released!
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:31:35 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+/FSRyEzmei8BygNDDpWADGdF8DDSjkztRhRVvsGy4g=; b=PTn7WX1KK/0dSS6FIFYsUszA4Ws6Mt0dYN7SJZBTosCP21ItqBzjrZK/Pf0rLuQ1T6 y/FpX0BI6aPE4s/KUck9OwUcQA7Zq7fpJCELDXoSUSIwwJIaIS1KDziHPBoW80Od8lbU OQnUtNtNW06ioik8uhGJG1AGAyWvyc8LWdup6EblLoIe9zvX04wXcnFTqv666HBBTals 4B3ep7SA8j5xE9HCfkHE/wZC3PgCb0Vpl5U4gmzJDqlddsUmf2Y7TAm7NxTFpiZhdC37 djmr2sn7amNV5nz28D79a6Z2zmnInc8RSyV/IGS8JYfhSYACvIAxCPpULudHIbOKB8a3 HGLA==
thanks, I did not paid much attention to it, the fix was easy:
https://bitbucket.org/eigen/eigen/changeset/a8d8ffd3f989/
changeset: a8d8ffd3f989
user: ggael
date: 2012-06-23 19:29:21
summary: fix GMRES
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Gael,
>
>> you expected a final, 3.1 but I annone a second release candidate
>> which is due to a few late warning and minor bug fixes.
>
> x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04: Looks mostly good on GCC 4.5.1, Intel 11.1, and
> Intel 12.0.0.
>
> Within 'make check' I see periodic gmres_1 failures. E.g.
> ./unsupported/test/gmres_1 s1340385327
> will always fail with
> gmres_1: /h2/rhys/Build/eigen/Eigen/src/Core/Assign.h:513: Derived&
> Eigen::DenseBase<Derived>::lazyAssign(const
> Eigen::DenseBase<OtherDerived>&) [with OtherDerived =
> Eigen::Matrix<double, -0x00000000000000001, 1>, Derived =
> Eigen::Block<Eigen::Block<Eigen::Matrix<double, -0x00000000000000001,
> -0x00000000000000001>, -0x00000000000000001, 1, true, true>,
> -0x00000000000000001, 1, false, true>]: Assertion `rows() ==
> other.rows() && cols() == other.cols()' failed.
> This problem is consistent across all three compilers. Thoughts?
>
> I know the test is in unsupported. I mention it because it may
> concern someone that 'make check' shows failures.
>
> - Rhys
>
>