Re: [eigen] Important: Relicensing Eigen to MPL2

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]


My contributions are also tiny if any.

Anyways I'm OK with MPL2.

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Tim Holy <holy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Likewise, my contributions are tiny but I'm OK with whatever the stalwarts of
> the project decide.
>
> --Tim
>
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2012 07:21:10 am Eamon Nerbonne wrote:
>> I've got virtually no code committed, but for the record: I'm OK with
>> whatever license Benoit chooses.
>>
>> Why not dual license just to avoid the discussions about license
>> compatibility?  I don't think mozilla's argument against it (difficulty
>> reintegrating forks) is really relevant for eigen.
>>
>> --eamon@xxxxxxxxxxxx - Tel#:+31-6-15142163
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 13:01, Manuel Yguel <manuel.yguel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Sorry for the delay,
>> > (though I was so small a contributor that it should not really matter ;)
>> >
>> > > 1. Would you agree to a MPL2 relicensing of the code you've
>> > > contributed to Eigen?
>> > >
>> >     b) yes
>> > >
>> > > 2. Would you personally consider such a MPL2 relicensing of Eigen a
>> > > good or a bad thing?
>> > >
>> >    b) Somewhat of a good thing
>> >
>> >   (I just did not answer a) because it is a change that affects every
>> >
>> > user: they should read the MPL2, well most of them will not do that,
>> > and for the new user it will be easier than with the old one)
>> >
>> > > 3. Which of the following courses of action would you consider the
>> > > best choice for Eigen?
>> > >
>> >   c) Relicense to a liberal license (MIT/BSD).
>> >
>> > - all the bests and thanks for taking care of such kind of things,
>> >
>> > Manuel
>
>



-- 
ricard
http://twitter.com/ricardmp
http://www.ricardmarxer.com
http://www.caligraft.com



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/