Re: [eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: [eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation*From*: Christoph Hertzberg <chtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:01:29 +0200

Abe Bachrach wrote: > [...] > In my mind, it would seem like having BOTH the verbose .cwise() and the > concise .* type operators for things like multiplication would make sense. Nice idea, but you can't overload operator.* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operators_in_C_and_C++#Member_and_pointer_operators Christoph -- ---------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Inf. Christoph Hertzberg Cartesium 0.051 Universität Bremen Enrique-Schmidt-Straße 5 28359 Bremen Tel: (+49) 421-218-64252 ----------------------------------------------

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation***From:*Abe Bachrach

**References**:**[eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation***From:*Abe Bachrach

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**[eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation** - Previous by thread:
**[eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] cwise operator vs matlab's .* notation**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |