| Re: [eigen] block of dense-block should again be block |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] block of dense-block should again be block
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:00:51 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ppLrquFuKO30/ZOMvBzc75pgZ8MOeyBQf2uVlUxit0g=; b=WE2nEFoxAk9k9WvkME5QGPNa+nVnlmBlv3kHTdWx2cswhVYYmsgxLJoU9ocu+Zwc4W TuN6O+RGcHNPm8NYh8bGXcclATBn+cAxTZdnQiaN6wJ3f5W5tot0l7ewmAQ8Wif9Owk/ 2Eb8ALVnLvKift8iVD9jpf5B2qTjnFZUR6Kmk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=chjvw4f1GW2KpqF+yZ4bl/cFPTAMGAxH/30zsme21invPKyxOQ5m9YIu9F0VGr6Ogg tMpIPX5ROfP0RbVhRQuhSUIFIsJeG/0D8jvx2LaQ9BYH4u149Owqjd3jApgrBYtkCTMS m1DNCIVgOabgaywNGt59yXI71FnLwXUOqrIXA=
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> reducing the number of Block types would be valuable
> as it could result in shorter compilation and smaller executables.
another compiling argument is to ease the writing of recursive block
algorithms, e.g, currently:
template<typename M> void foo(const M& m)
{
if(m.size() < threshold)
// unblocked...
else
foo(m.block(....));
}
won't compile.
gael