| Re: [eigen] exception specifications... |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] exception specifications...
- From: leon zadorin <leonleon77@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:43:22 +1000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jyH5pSNeZT3x0W8ZKLluPeBzgnpQnRPwXIj92ly11zQ=; b=HF0AtnqYz/+XEZ/54qZt6OFzvNbFdAIC0h5izqxSle0c7/kALbmZA2yPjFTevxKkMY m5rDqsnimICsrPsDq4GAtK0ki6H9mMrNi04BAwHXL2NhoyW2vrEB8zKjq5BNnkMum3rQ pAmUsEdro00tKJ7+CP9T3JbOijwXk0hpR2dWQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DYlBjHEv04vBkU2JtwL8xhLV84uoFoiUQzxAjS/zZbrW3i8I9H2Ds1bwXdusoAyR88 s/7HBKdCeBXDA66P7SGPeQ/RFpRh8ztKEHfWVv2UjlyAHda59mCXU2Zc8s+It/EffI3J 353SZG8eER2hGobABRtiM4O2RwK54NT2QMm34=
On 4/19/10, Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...] the ISO C++ committee did not
> decide to deprecate exception specifications
you mean replacing 'throw()' with proposed 'noexcept' keyword?
http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=cplusplus&seqNum=481
If such becomes adopted, then one could have an empty macro in place
of 'throw()' for the time-being to facilitate a quicker
search'n'replace of 'throw()' to noexecpt :-) if, that is, one is to
adopt the new not-yet adopted standard :-)
leon.