| Re: [eigen] again msvc inlining... |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] again msvc inlining...
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:59:24 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7MiikBV/ZMrda0ze/bk0RV1/iMk5bv/0Xxwgx4u4Nfw=; b=jO5vT2jX8cJSihuh3zPlMYWcOVSBxT76uNcA0u9VRXuMDoBBg8psFIV7DIAReVHYf8 KlsOqq35Xs9zMMH/ekITBzeYSKIj+lJQdYGm3rtbRvW2sHk82bWM7rI1HnTv7cWENQt0 RStHveykrkvALzkM4ob8ZWLYv8gYLeV3ljt0c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gxRZyqKloGjyGbBsWMUeJZjM+8ij2ZvbJXhhPcEHX3eAqBBqvszd1SUz6w2+6mUoIP 3HyC7GC1woeMBvgwKptYRZ5Pl3HuVnZuZ32jxpeIUIdQal2BR6Z640cJeZHfrCI19I/N q2PiylmE04tMaUtJhq1upGAlSjctV8EKu9Pqw=
2010/3/8 Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> for known reasons, MSVC is oftentimes not inlining
> DenseBase<Derived>::eval(). Any objections against changing the
> EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE into a simple inline?
Replacing a EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE by a 'inline' is generally something
you can do without asking since
- you're the MSVC guru
- if there were another compiler needing this, the person having
added this EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE should have added a comment explaining
the reason for it :)
Benoit
>
> Regards,
> Hauke
>
>
>