Re: [eigen] fft module status

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

I'd say go for 2D FFT first

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Mark Borgerding <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You are correct in your assessment.  The MKL backend and 2-D FFTs are still
> I updated the status page and put a link to the EigenFFT wiki page to
> clarify this.
> Please feel free to opine (here or on the wiki discussion page) which ranks
> higher in priority: MKL backend or multi-dimensional FFTs.
> FYI, If you want to use MKL as a backend before I get around to writing it
> (probably within a month), you can make the intel MKL fftw3xc interface that
> comes with it.  Then tell Eigen::FFT that it should use FFTW as a backend.
>  This would allow the advantages of MKL with the current state of the code.
> -- Mark
> Thomas Capricelli wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm a bit confused with respect to the FFT module. The status page on the
>> wiki seems to say that all but tests and documentation is done, but i can't
>> find support for dimension more than 1, and i can't find anything related to
>> the MLK backend..
>> Mark, can you provide some more information ? I have looked at your clone,
>> but there doesn't seem to be anything more there. Could it be that some
>> commits were not merged in ?
>> best regards,
>> Thomas

Rohit Garg

Senior Undergraduate
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+