Re: [eigen] (vec1*vec2.transpose())*vec3 on 2.0.5/6 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] (vec1*vec2.transpose())*vec3 on 2.0.5/6
- From: Márton Danóczy <marton78@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:21:50 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Q8kBCe3T6zatZBs/1wYn2Emkh840Z7MmvEn7qmO/9c=; b=FVoAXTlzh3dqobhvfrBfMKQKwh8LFUonRQiiubhJ5Rel0H7PZio/TS/EnvvMBhd11t 4tcs3qfuf41sn5FSJ3no7XFxTdCZjx8ttdOmNPN89HRq0s4bksWF1v8A4vBjFOy64ezZ RDgK7S8QIIXri+Mo/EfEVHz9+mntctnxk2nJE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=awxdCW20TJTA6mN7lcGhMmiVR3ptLKobHOhMDxekfCuV2d4WickQfwY5mZBmrJsjvL o76SxQ9p5xKky1hwRJEucoWX894l+qHI3Hp8vWDVjwv9eL8AMJNIhkM0LUoOvO02VU6l DDLx2Dz3tY29/AicavqF/EgArrTb6LXQzikx4=
2009/9/30 Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich@xxxxxxxxx>:
> When you're investigating, would you please also check that it behaves
> correctly for
> (vec1*vec1.transpose())*vec2
Just out of curiosity: why would anyone need to compute this kind of
product? The scalar product in vec1*(vec1.dot(vec2)) would be much
faster than forming the rank-1 matrix. Or does Eigen automatically
compute products the fastest way, no matter how bracketing is done?
Marton