Re: [eigen] (vec1*vec2.transpose())*vec3 on 2.0.5/6

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

2009/9/30 Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich@xxxxxxxxx>:
> When you're investigating, would you please also check that it behaves
> correctly for
>    (vec1*vec1.transpose())*vec2

Just out of curiosity: why would anyone need to compute this kind of
product? The scalar product in vec1*( would be much
faster than forming the rank-1 matrix. Or does Eigen automatically
compute products the fastest way, no matter how bracketing is done?


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+