Re: [eigen] 2.0 testing needed |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] 2.0 testing needed
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:18:15 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ys9wYsAmgUAGOz4virPVNnpjibIHjVH3t+U4rkytTaQ=; b=NbNgqZ0XZlYwfNewiolEe9zaKmibYRvM/rDn01yLYLOlj/Y4fsAh3C6uPlY9JZY5s4 2A8H57tiX2T1ZIKUu/L8PxzN9g9HbIWr6H9Yf3OXLD3iwDkNTIck8QupcB73qbnWhCHY pqPLUAb6uWexOov61FoNeNk3eQyvkxydHfpN4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fYmkbNv4PFsL0DIbBeV87XhbeW7//qe7oFEL2BvCA2f0HLcgYxlFjLQbE0oWoUyoGR BBWlICXU+SSYtdJj/vz0Y5JTUdLcheXpPO0LRuozjYNmIjvvB4yqUjvSd0kAdfsONCOy 46oCsygZawIhE/Zbh+yZglO/3q90oircjrvBM=
it's green here:
http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/CDash/index.php?project=Eigen%202.0&date=2009-09-19
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We now have enough in the 2.0 branch to justify a 2.0.6 release, but
> this needs a lot of testing first.
>
> The most dangerous change is that I backported:
> * the body of ei_aligned_malloc and ei_aligned_free
> ---> this means that the choice of aligned malloc routine may now be
> different. in particular, posix_memalign moved a bit down the list.
> ---> the best thing that you can do here is to run the unit tests
> "dynalloc" and "unalignedassert"
> * the EIGEN_ALIGN logic
> ---> this means that now you can also use EIGEN_DONT_ALIGN with the 2.0 branch
> ---> this means that the corresponding platform checks have changed,
> so do test that your plaftform is still well handled (alignment if you
> want alignment, no alignment if you don't want)
> ---> to check if alignment is enabled, check the value of EIGEN_ALIGN,
> it should be 1
>
> Benoit
>
>
>