Re: [eigen] Diagonal matrices diff

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]


A suggestion: Instead of mailing a diff, use Rietveld to post
something for review. It's much easier to review that way instead of
the raw diff; you don't need to have eigen checked out to see the
context.

http://codereview.appspot.com/

If you have a gmail account, you can already use it. It's very easy to
post new reviews.

Keir

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before i can do the svd i need Banded matrices, for which i needed
> some improvements in DiagonalCoeffs.
> So here's a patch but as it is changing several things i thought i'd
> ask for your opinion (you know who you are) before committing.
>
> * rename DiagonalCoeffs (clumsy name) to Band. I tried first Diagonal,
> but that name was already taken by a constant Diagonal which is used
> for various things already.
> * rename the template parameter DiagId to Index.
> * keep diagonal() unchanged, returns a Band<Derived, 0>
> * rename diagonal<int>() to band<int>()
> * introduce diagonal(int), returning a Band<Derived, Dynamic>. The
> trick here is as we already do in Block : use ei_int_if_dynamic to
> store the Index in Band.
>   ---> that is the improvement that i need in order to code
> BandedMatrix. No need to unroll an outer loop there, and that also
> will reduce compilation times (only one Band type instantiated).
>
> Cheers,
> Benoit
>



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/