Re: [eigen] Unifying decomposition interfaces |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Unifying decomposition interfaces
- From: Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:55:21 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Wtqxphx9IIbMVQbM/iGFGfppK/mkJZW5ELhmevZXZc=; b=loI6suMZ7lmLq/T47mS6kM6WtEYyOha2c4HT8YtL2mU7/ODzcTpUU3KM2ZgdkP9irH rj2g6y5o8rIzebvKdsiEoHXssqAoWHJYNaVHFPPYwnSBAFyLTj04+VCThGcFw7mU9ULG /yJeuStPU9lRTyITTFNFsL1B0w4J47C/qycXI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qn1zcA3YmctmdepxWAGxeX9jtF4GpjOT3xE0N9isRJV/En5CMzMmV4RpbHKUeHLWAG jNdFolGqJIIKg0UebcfaMjpon+h4tuziLvJ26tTV3zO80n+ZEOAFZL2JQAwSfVoozwwz dclFhqvyozv1FwHgLt2YBnJWaejjlaQ0iRzrE=
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At first glance, i'd rather have asserts in every public function (...)
For the moment I did that for PartialLU, LU and QR and I also added
unit tests for the safe-guards. I did not introduce a new member but
checked whether the size of a particular temporary is bigger than zero
- same effect no more members.
I commited the changes to the fork.
- Hauke