| Re: [eigen] sse asin implementation |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] sse asin implementation
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:48:04 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MMCMG21K/amAhKx94fy/TbdGY1Idj5lVMxXFNABWYWI=; b=rnwJ2avNdwYIWpu3zWQqcMFBCdnGL2NoWjc55xn+QnWCzf7rkmosYHVuBPfFxvYhrr 8EiirSHPKOjHvp6Fh0Kracc6hO/4TuS193dT2HNo7QbFO89nUNDbGcA4pztRj3jpcrmu fyJgY18Vq7hecpqVl+v+weOsj4sjPfR1F++dg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OiCeyWog4e8ckXQ8okcLLKdDruVLwrA1biq09ZPwAzYokpyuuEA6ntQW+TuGBZ2Z1R LBdOy36ZXGALzQ1QOTtp/Zmeu+deUOhPGl7rlS94xG5ke1Y1kNQJUQFpn6eT9j41660P hhc0fgbCkYNef1NP90dnd+pWnH4xvjzRsSmXY=
2009/4/14 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I am not too hot
> on implementing functions which are de facto outside eigen.
Sure, very understandable. Really you should only implement what _you_
personally have a use case for -- that's the first test.
Though pow() is important enough that if there existed an
implementation that's really faster than exp(b*log(a)), it'd certainly
go to Eigen itself.
I'm updating the TODO to make sure people contact us before spending
time on a particular item.
Benoit