| Re: [eigen] Stability of memory allocation functions |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Stability of memory allocation functions
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:38:18 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ykkAEF3l6fXQAdQdjAxQugERj74MSvsjf2XIXLWsu5g=; b=lOiwTkuw5wUasO+Rcfo2WJbuTFaD+QumJQazePp0NQmJ74vtNlEgchJUI2MVSxjmDx Yo2jasVy63DiC782U6jg7+/f2PLJeFlcEMupfi8IQBlm5a6gKd2UGkhvw3OQMAr9y8Gr CkDfQL98u3/uDwStpiJc3EiS81q/ScWn224xo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Tz6oZA0hCW/NvmfEPRy3T1QMJiOpF2pJgxUpMpRRjoceXFsN3bgcwVphx3QBmkT450 G+1gb6TsdX2RHFzWG6SgHlpupdwFXSe1+mYothEC7T0Ys778QQFkfmuoEwMrLeblcFPr Y+ypiW2banYT2gEIxAe0MjDFgQpD5GpK5kboI=
Hi,
go ahead, there is no reason to change these two functions in the future.
Gael.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Patrick Mihelich
<patrick.mihelich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if certain of the internal aligned memory management
> functions (I'm thinking mainly of ei_aligned_malloc / free) might be made
> part of the public API. I have some specialized code where I'm using
> posix_memalign to do 16-byte aligned allocation, and I need to replace this
> call with something cross-platform. ei_aligned_malloc would be perfect, but
> I try to avoid using things that aren't part of the public API.
>
> Cheers,
> Patrick
>