| Re: [eigen] Another LDLt issue |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Another LDLt issue
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:50:45 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZpZlnUKu9YHQfplYrJaRTiklukNFEgAd67IJ1/v3IqY=; b=qzLLs3/qR7I8gM5c7bnz5O8N0zzH12SP0YQaNZHBqyW2Lns09VFtbAxNt4mbiU3E7H sxMRGNfCfh7/g/olDZ160XJlkSeG6CgV8Cf1bJ1RNUCn05zHFfEThqyOyGxm1PmZKq14 C/25w66XcEN4WhTEtwJwM+TcIAAaw+wX67jEA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iT/eZrZ/M2gKLLCtg+gl5jeHkV9DIPWlfKy/lPxPrb9uQxGkagvhWaayFOc476QqJw DteD/Nk1WylwFsO66Udiw8wirOXZlXkjk9fhDqcOo8gH/G1AbEy4AmFazJn0MTMhDzhN pGWuLXnFDy08CP6MfOs8wMAaRxOGBu+7os9Jo=
>> No, I don't think so. dsytrf succeeds for the negative definite case
Ah, I didn't realize you were now talking about the negative definite
case. That's another thing. For sure, with 1 more line of code, the
current LDLt in Eigen can handle even the negative semidefinite case.
The only difficult case is the indefinite one.
Cheers,
Benoit