| Re: [eigen] Matrix assignment |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
Pretty good idea!
We'll just need to make clear in the docs: "if you use the default Matrix()
constructor for a dynamic-size matrix, then you need to set() this matrix
before doing anything else with it".
Seems reasonable to me, and i like the idea of avoiding all that overhead in
dynamic matrix assignment; even if it was negligible in terms of time, it
generated code, for every different expression type we assigned, which could
be non-negligible.
Cheers,
Benoit
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 18:37:35 Cristóvão Sousa wrote:
> And _maybe_ there will be no need for a zero sized matrix
> operator= resizing assignment, because set() is as well
> intuitive.
>
> Cheers,
> Cristóvão Sousa
>
>
> ---
---