|Re: [eigen] Owl sketch|
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]
Hi David, On Sunday 30 March 2008 20:15:23 David Benjamin wrote: > Attached more sketches, we could mix and match the bits of the various > owls. Let's be precise: I would propose this mix and match: - Take the owl at the top-left. - Keep the hanging hat (great idea!) - Beak and eyes: as in the first owl (at the bottom-right) (that slightly serious air will be doubly funny with the hanging hat). (for the general shape of the head, keep that of the topleft owl). - Book under left wing like first owl - Right wing raised professorly, with or without chalk - 3 or 4 feathers for 1's of the identity matrix Really love your sketches, exactly the spirit I initially envisioned. But if you can also play with the factory/engineers idea, I'm thrilled to see the result! Cheers, Benoit > > (Apologies for the incredibly bad "scan"... I do not have easy access > to a scanner at the moment, so I used a camera for this (and the > previous). My wonderful picture-taking skills also cut off some text, > so some of it was rewritten with the GIMP by a left-handed person > using a mouse right-handed. :-D) > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Benoît Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1) Your owl looks quite old/serious, I wonder what could be done to make > > it look younger. Maybe it's the shape of the head, with the eyes very > > near the feathers that delimit the bottom of the head, which (remotely) > > evocates flappy cheeks/eyebags. Maybe you could also experiment with an > > open beak, as if it were shouting "eureka!!" or "it feels good to be a > > fluffy owl" enthusiastically. > > Are the new faces better? > > > 2) About the readability of the identity matrix, especially at smaller > > sizes, I'd suggest reducing the number of 1's. Probably 4 are enough. > > Yes, that seems to work better. > > > 3) About the professor hat on the stick, I wonder if that will still be > > understandable at smaller sizes. The hat's ribbon on the head might also > > be harder to understand at smaller sizes. > > Hrm, maybe. Scaling the sketch down, it's still mostly visible, but it > might be somewhat unclear. It also protrudes a lot, which would make > the owl smaller on 135x135, which might not be so great. > > > 4) Maybe (I know I'm pushing it) it's worth experimenting without the > > hat and stick, instead rasing the right wing in a professorly way ? > > Is the upper-left "professorly"? (Ignore the hat on his ear. I > couldn't resist. :-D) I'm not really sure how one raises an arm/wing > professorly.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
|Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+||http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/|