| Re: [eigen] Bug in traspose |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Bug in traspose
- From: "Schleimer, Ben" <bensch128@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:03:11 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=chCzoy6NnuiDX9IvkgkG6JH2EIyBpnIPAuUvYGqzN3wOWn0zIx39wqG7fcG5LMRGm2YrPxI0UTu2nZhDj+HXVRMKumoZQ/K/yxLIlg/KrGOzUCgqDBSG4W1q+7a8/5t7O24Sx0TDonwDaR4g4M9jy4tk9UiEDkutKs7G5Re7nK0=;
--- Benoît Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Ramon! Indeed you're right.
>
> There is no bugzilla, you did the right thing by posting this bug here.
> Tuxfamily does not offer a bugzilla service, and KDE's one has a terrible
> bug-reporting interface IMO so I'm still not sure what to do. For now the
> number of bug reports does not justify opening a bugzilla anyway.
It weird but the krita folk are having a similar situation where their bug reporting system is
sub-par. It was suggested to use Launchpad (aka inkspace) instead...
> The fact that my unit-tests did not catch this bug is interesting (I can see
> the reason). I will keep that in mind for the next round of unit-tests
> improvements (alpha4?). I am also thinking that QTestLib is not very good for
> us, actually I am already bypassing large parts of it in the main() function,
> so we might get rid of it.
Any thoughts on which testing framework you want to switch to?
I've used CxxTest before and liked it...
Cheers
Ben