[cllfst] Re: [cllfst] Fwd: Pourquoi ne pas mettre un fichier word en attaché ? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/cllfst Archives
]
- To: cllfst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [cllfst] Re: [cllfst] Fwd: Pourquoi ne pas mettre un fichier word en attaché ?
- From: "Nizar TLILI" <nizar.tlili@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:53:09 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oktr/DnURSNaWG5L8WY2LnXq2v1aNQvfayR4YJUwoZFvPx+OacUznF9kLG60zuMscs7L5L5bCgUzucfQ6xfCHQfzvr/xB+pn7hV08bKr7lqHnbOVr8On7p6L6yqsOMPJFb5YuYEVwE5ooqr8bKBXFofKQFJUchDpIa+kG1b/to0=
Mais il est fou ce Stallman?
je cite :
Plain ASCII is probably the best,
because that is convenient for citing portions in a response.
--
Nizar TLILI