Re: [AD] 5.0.0 RC2 release notes |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 17:04 -0500, Evert Glebbeek wrote:On the other hand, git would soon save more time than the initial
> On 5 Dec 2010, at 16:58 , Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> > Shouldn't take any time at all. But fine. I get your point.
>
> I'll need to download & install git and I'll need to change over my
> Allegro tree. No, it isn't hard. But it's enough of a hassle that
> given the choice between doing that or doing something else with my
> time instead, I'll do something else (that's in practice, not in
> principle). I simply don't have that much time. :(
> I haven't even got round to installing 5.1 SVN...
>
download time. Where svn commit for 70 patches takes > 60 minutes, git
push would just take 10 seconds (!). For just a single patch "git pull;
git commit; git push" also will be faster than "svn up; svn commit" but
the difference wouldn't be so noticeable of course.
Also my impression is that SVN is basically dead as of now (yes, seems
it died really fast, much faster than anyone could have predicted). But
SF, google code, github, gitorious... it's basically all git and
otherwise mercurial or bazaar.
--
Elias Pschernig <elias.pschernig@xxxxxxxxxx>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
--
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |