[no subject]

On 7 December 2010 01:09, Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2010-12-06, Micha=C5=82 Cicho=C5=84 <michcic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Git is fine for me. Those who are resistive to changes, can use
>> git-svn to access repositories as usual.
>> I vote: yes.
>
> git-svn goes the other way around.
>
> But it got me wondering:
> https://github.com/blog/644-subversion-write-support
>
> So it *would* be possible, at least with github, to allow (basic?) svn
> read/write access to a git repository. =C2=A0Unfortunately it happens to =
be
> broken right now[1] but I assume it will be restored by the time we
> seriously consider a switch.
>
> Developers would need to sign up with github as well, which is kind of
> annoying, but that's really only a few people.
>
> Peter
>
> [1]: http://support.github.com/discussions/repos/4986-svn-access-not-work=
ing-on-a-relatively-new-repository
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly
> upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to mo=
ve
> off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to bui=
ld,
> use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus
> Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers



--=20
thedmd, Micha=C5=82 Cicho=C5=84
Artifex Mundi
michcic@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.artifexmundi.com