Re: [AD] ungetc

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On December 22, 2010, Michał Cichoń wrote:
> Agree. I never used this function anyway.
> 
> On 22 December 2010 08:58, Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2010-12-21, Matthew Leverton <meffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Or alternatively, only if the ungetc hook is left null, is the above
> >> default implementation is used. Otherwise, drivers could fill it in
> >> and do something non-standard.
> > 
> > I think that's a good idea.

For what its worth, I also agree with this. This way VFS drivers that actually 
have an ungetc can use that, like stdio.

Unless of course that leads to too much variability, then it might make sense 
to use our own, but meh.

> > Peter
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----- Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment
> > (ROI) of Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and
> > break-even within 7 months.  Over 3 million businesses have gone Google
> > with Google Apps: an online email calendar, and document program that's
> > accessible from your browser. Read the Forrester report:
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew --
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers


-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/