| Re: [AD] al_copy_transform |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On July 17, 2010, Peter Wang wrote:
> On 2010-07-17, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On July 16, 2010, Trent Gamblin wrote:
> > > On Fri, July 16, 2010 5:56 pm, Peter Wang said:
> > > > Should we swap the order of the arguments to al_copy_transform,
> > > > so the destination comes first? I almost got bit by this yesterday
> > > > (saved by const)
> > >
> > > For me, I'll always look it up in the docs, because that's something
> > > I probably won't remember... but C convention is usually destination
> > > first, so I'd say yes.
> >
> > I thought we switched the al_transform_transoform arg order to match
> > al_copy_transform?
>
> r13425 says:
>
> Switched the order of parameters in al_transform_transform to make
> it match the rest of the transform functions.
>
> where the change moves the destination to the first argument.
>
> -void al_transform_transform(const ALLEGRO_TRANSFORM *trans,
> ALLEGRO_TRANSFORM *trans2) +void
> al_transform_transform(ALLEGRO_TRANSFORM *trans, const ALLEGRO_TRANSFORM
> *other)
>
> So al_copy_transform should have been changed as well.
Oh, I suppose so.
> Peter
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx