| Re: [AD] al_copy_transform |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On July 16, 2010, Trent Gamblin wrote:
> On Fri, July 16, 2010 5:56 pm, Peter Wang said:
> > Should we swap the order of the arguments to al_copy_transform,
> > so the destination comes first? I almost got bit by this yesterday
> > (saved by const)
>
> For me, I'll always look it up in the docs, because that's something
> I probably won't remember... but C convention is usually destination
> first, so I'd say yes.
I thought we switched the al_transform_transoform arg order to match
al_copy_transform?
> Trent :n)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx