Re: [AD] i386 flag

[Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On Sat March 14 2009, Peter Wang wrote:
>  >
>  > We don't need to support 386s, do we? I think it should work with
>  > -march=i486.
>  >
>  > I can't reproduce it though. It's weird; the atomic ops aren't even
>  > called any more. We can just delete aintern_atomicops.h (or #if 0 it
>  > out) if you think that would be better.
>
>
> Could be a dependency issue, that file wasn't properly recompiled.

It is properly recompiled. And yes it works with i486.
Note that only g++ complains.

And, um, I sill get the error when I #if 0 out aintern_atomicops.h.



--
Milan Mimica
http://sparklet.sf.net