| Re: [AD] al_toggle_window_frame |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
I'd vote for removal. In fact, OS X doesn't really 'like' frameless
windows at all, they require some extra coding to get them to respond
to events (I guess the designers imagined they'd only be used for
splash screens and other passive windows)
Pete
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2008, Elias Pschernig wrote:
>> It seems the current X11 implementation of this doesn't work under
>> windowmaker and KDE4, and according to that bug on the SF tracker it
>> also can't work under OSX. Given that it's not a very important
>> function, I wonder now if we should remove it again?
>>
>> (This has nothing to do with the ALLEGRO_NOFRAME flag passed to
>> al_set_new_display_flags, which works everywhere as far as I know.)
>>
>> --
>> Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> Yeah, I don't think it should be kept. X wm's aren't required to notice WM
> hint changes for "extended"/"enhanced" flags like that. If both X and OSX have
> issues with it, thats two out of three main platforms.
>
> --
> Thomas Fjellstrom
> tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>