Re: [AD] 64bit ready?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Coordination of admins/developers of the game programming library Allegro <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] 64bit ready?
From: AJ <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:14:00 +1100

allefant wrote:

On Jan 29, 2008 1:56 PM, AJ <aj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Has this situation been covered in future allegro designs?
Is there a solution for this?

If no solution is currently tabled, would it be appropriate to add
ASSERT(sizeof(..))  anywhere potential for problems exists?


Personally, I prefer this solution:

Never ever use long. Use int when it's ok to have only 32-bit. Use
int32_t and int64_t where it matters.



Agreed.   Can we start looking at solutions for all instances of long ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] 64bit ready?
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] 64bit ready?
  - From: Thomas Fjellstrom

References:
- [AD] 64bit ready?
  - From: AJ
- Re: [AD] 64bit ready?
  - From: allefant

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] windows time functions
Next by Date: Re: [AD] windows time functions
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] 64bit ready?
Next by thread: Re: [AD] 64bit ready?

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/