| Re: [AD] Function parameter ordering conventions |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Trent Gamblin <trent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Elias and I were discussing how function parameters should be ordered
> with the new API. I thought (and I think Elias agreed) that the order
> function(src, src_params, dst, dst_params) is the most natural
Why put source before destination?
That's the opposite of "memcpy(dst, src, len)",
"strcpy(dst, src)", and don't forget "dst = src".
Destination first feels more natural to me.
Regards,
Scott