Re: [AD] a fix struct for dallegro

[Chris Robinson <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Saturday 21 April 2007 08:06:32 am torhus@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Ok, I can rename them to fixcos, fixsin, etc, and just remove the member
> functions.  Then they would overload the fixed versions, like this:
>
> fix fixcos(fix);
> fixed fixcos(fixed);
>
> Is that a good idea, or could it cause confusion?  Seems ok to me,
> global overloads are very common in C++ too.  Chris, is this okay with
> you, or do you still think I should drop the whole thing?

I still think the whole fix class is at best, redundant, and at worst, 
confusing and error-prone. But as long as the standard math routines aren't 
overloaded, I won't complain too loudly.