[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] OSX x86 patch
- From: "Peter Hull" <peterhull90@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 17:56:13 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TsXNUxGOKbKUnd41LoCyY81uDTrSbc3uMaD36862+S6Ws7ASFaw/UsexEmn6gOlsiLc5Mial0mDFfc9KnRVZXXeFejyB3xPC5LtWJtJ3PpgjN17pGtNZYFB2jb19aoacngNcV0pxUl9eAygEw5KYxliahoq5gPmxTrC67TDW9eU=
> Regarding asm code for the OSX port and out of curiosity, does all of it
> cause problems, or is it just the bank switching that does?
>
I can only refer you to Juvinious's report on #allegro, which was
'Argg' or 'Blurgh' or something like that. I thought it would be
enough to replace $(C_OBJECTS) with $(I386_OBJECTS) in makefile.osx,
and get rid of ALLEGRO_USE_C, but it is obviously more complicated
than that. What happened exactly I don't know.
IMO, C is the way to go in the future anyway.
Pete