[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] NewAPI Poll
- From: Chris <chris.kcat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:21:42 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=F/JK/Z7Rc8ZGhI4oA3bmdR6fbakNYNh5jeYGUXVDBiTh2gnjnyHaxsmlBDxZswYt7bz7gpz0bsUx/UjX+V6ZojIT2HUa9E3q5sqcYJN3VU+8iLaC5BYZFf86XB9Xt4d8F6C5cmRpzTflCTpY9UP5OJ1RmRHdsWwHTBXfOGtpglc=
On Monday 20 February 2006 22:16, Karthik Kumar wrote:
> KittyKat and I were having a discussion on the question if Allegro must be
> state based (globally, like OpenGL) or not (like DirectX).
And as I said, there's no reason for this poll. :P I set my thoughts in my
post, and people will respond as they want. Getting a yes/no answer (when it
doesn't have to even be a stern yes or a stern no) isn't as important as
knowing why you get the answer you do.