| Re: [AD] Indexed datafiles |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 14:49 -0800, Chris wrote:
> One problem with this (as well as the current implementation) is that it
> doesn't call _install_allegro at all if the versions aren't compatible. As I
> understand it, _install_allegro was made to initialize stuff needed for
> allegro_message even if the call ultimately fails. This no longer happens if
> the it fails because of a version mismatch.
>
> One solution may be to call
> _install_allegro(SYSTEM_NONE, NULL, NULL);
> before returning !0, if that would still initialize allegro_message.
>
I don't think it would, since allegro_message is in the system driver
vtable, and SYSTEM_NONE has a NULL for it, so only the default printf
would be used, which is already used when no driver is present at all.
--
Elias Pschernig