| Re: [AD] build process overhaul |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Vincent Penecherc'h wrote:
> > Yes, true - so it wouldn't be an optimal solution. My main motivation
> > for automake is that so many projects seem to use it, so it can't be
> > that bad..
>
> Mostly to be able to build out of the box for more or less POSIX systems
> that are not "supported", I think. It would be a tall order for Allegro
> to be able to do that anyway :)
Sorry for not posting this on the Wiki - I'm at work and didn't see
how to add posts there immediately.
Has anyone considered Qmake yet? I personally don't have any
experience with it and was somewhat peeved with earlier QT versions
for them intrudocing yet another build system, but nevertheless its an
active and supported alternative.
If anyone has experience with Qmake and wether or not it would be
suitable for Allegro, it might be good to add that to the list on the
Wiki.
Hein Zelle
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<
Unix is user friendly. It's just very particular about who
it's friends are.
Hein Zelle hein@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.icce.rug.nl/~hein
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<