Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005

Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:40:06 +0100

On Saturday 31 December 2005 05:11, aj wrote:
> it might be time to start considering dropping MSVC6, it is buggy, old, 
> and there are better alternatives.

I agree, but it's also widely used. And as Thomas F said, none of the MSVC 
versions supports C99 properly, so what does dropping MSVC6 buy us in that 
case?

Evert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
  - From: aj
- Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
  - From: Chris

References:
- [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
  - From: Karthik Kumar
- Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
  - From: aj

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: 4.2.1 [was Re: [AD] Open Watcom trouble]
Next by Date: Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005
Next by thread: Re: [AD] 4.2.0 release failed build on VC 2005

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/