Re: [AD] malloc

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 2005-11-20, aj <aj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> what all this talk of garbage collectors?
> 1.   allegro is a C library right ?
> 2.   is free()  really so slow that we need to use a garbage collector ?

It can be useful when using Allegro from languages which do use garbage
collectors.  It's not _necessary_ to play nice, but it's also not
necessary to allow the user to select the implementation of malloc.

> i know the whole thing is going to get a design, and changes (as 
> mentioned already), but is there any reason why we still cant change all 
> the malloc's to _al_malloc() in the mean time ?

It will be a waste of your time if we have to change it again later.

Peter





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/