[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] malloc
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:18:15 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=PkIB9+4UZDMrSyDZ+87skBI8eRkI9LvGE98AVCNXrB1zneApKdlbtCMxXcjB6EYQnM7kaK7zcbNsg9Saw7gxXKwncFoNKzWXEhCOMm5YjQAWbIxOZI2YJ4VuUvEQkpvacxdTs7S5sFTZaLueB5np3D8vsv3cmX4ZemTINj5Pxps=
On November 18, 2005 11:06 am, aj wrote:
> >I would only add:
> >
> > void *al_malloc_atomic(size_t);
>
> how can anything returning void* have conditions on its use ?
>
Two possibilities,
1) Its the honor system, and
2) If you don't follow the rules, and things screw up, its your fault.
--
Thomas Fjellstrom