Re: [AD] Proposing patch in windows detection

[aj <aj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Victor wrote:

> --- aj <aj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Do you have any evidence its not the same thing ?
> > MSDN is all we can go by, if its not docmented in there, its not
> > worth 
> > debating.
> >    
>
> No i didn't have any evidence, so I asked (I know, here isn't the
> better place to do that). But now gnolam already clarified this.
>
>  
>
> > And if you can proof something is wrong on MSDN, submit a bug, it'll
> > get 
> > corrected.
> >    
>
> Surely there is a misunderstanding here. I didn't said that something
> is right or not MSDN.
>
>  
>
> > URL, on msdn ?   somehow i think XP and XPx64 will be able to be 
> > differentiated.
> >
> >    
>
> No, the problem is differentiate XPx64 and Win2003.

To determine whether a Win32-based application is running on WOW64, call 
the *IsWow64Process* 
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dllproc/base/iswow64process.asp> 
function.

Windows Server "Longhorn" 	6.0
Windows "Longhorn" 	6.0
Windows Server 2003 R2 	5.2
Windows Server 2003 	5.2
Windows XP 	5.1
Windows 2000 	5.0






> I found that:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/base/getting_the_system_version.asp
>
> Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
> 	
> 		
> _______________________________________________________ 
> Faça do Yahoo! sua página inicial. 
> http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html 
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
>