[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] Subversion
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:31:33 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=dJ71IjWVwq6A+1umZMaqtkM/gasWSL8p2Mg/hhpFJMXfCrZQgAP05bN7XTZtWOQSSl4hl4udV5UAkiy5cdHMu9Netr2WIxPrZE47THaPTY+AZQnsGLge0HFyY4HwPse3OYkyXoTJTLf5a7hFJQ2Q1GCQfQeYTGZl3Hs5+z5ZpMs=
On November 2, 2005 02:00 am, Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 10:42 +0200, Evert Glebbeek wrote:
> > > > One question though: will we keep the 4.2 branch in CVS, or move that
> > > > to subversion as well? This is relevant for a 4.2.1 release.
> > > > I propose to keep the 4.2 branch in CVS and do all the 4.3/5.0 stuff
> > > > in SVN.
> > >
> > > Why? I think everything should go into SVN.
> >
> > I figured it'd be less hassle on the whole, but maybe you're right and it
> > doesn't really matter.
> > In which case having everything in one version control system is good.
> >
> > Aside:
> > To be on the safe side, we may want to backup the entire CVS repository
> > somewhere else before switching to SVN. Is there a way to download it (or
> > something like that) from SourceForge?
>
> Yes, here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/alleg-cvsroot.tar.bz2
>
> Link is from here:
> https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/cvs.php?group_id=5665
Be carefull though, those are only generated nightly.
> --
> Elias Pschernig
--
Thomas Fjellstrom